A Better 510k Webinar

 

Thoughts on compliance, strategy and development in the IVD world

Search Our Site

Wednesday, September 01, 2010
By Mya Thomae
Category: FDA General

So, let's be honest: yesterday's webinar on the proposed 510k changes was a disappointment. I suppose that's inevitable when you lift your agenda from a radio call-in show. Caller three... you're on the air!

In case you missed it, here's what I remember from the meeting. I was a bit distracted, so I might be getting a few of the details wrong.

 

QUESTION: The 510k process is really confusing. Has FDA ever considered improving their communications?

ANSWER: Yeah, that's a great idea. Maybe we should schedule a public webinar or something.

 

QUESTION: I'm confused. This is a webinar, but there are no visuals? Why didn't I just call in on the phone?

ANSWER: Oh, we had cameras set up and everything. But then Dr. Shuren thought it was Hawaiian shirt day, so we had to turn them off.

 

QUESTION: I have a three-part question. First, what will the new requirements for clinical data be for my product? Second, can I get you to put that in writing and never change it? Third, shouldn't everything you do be subjected to proposed rulemaking?

ANSWER: It's unfortunate you made that a three-part question. When you started, we actually had a pretty clear process for regulating your product, but by the time you finished, we had already published five new Notices to Industry. Sucks to be you, I guess.

 

QUESTION: Have you considered that you're a drag on industry?

ANSWER: Have you considered that these questions aren't anonymous?

 

QUESTION: OK, seriously... why can't you have one set of consistent rules?

ANSWER: FDA regulates everything from hot dogs to MRIs. Do you honestly think that all those things should be regulated the exact same way?

 

QUESTION: What's the difference between "clinical utility" and "clinical usability"?

ANSWER: Amazingly, we think that these words should refer to different things. We're also working on finding a word that falls somewhere between "clearance" and "approval" for the new Class IIb products. We're thinking of calling that an "affirmation".

 

QUESTION: That's it, I can't take any more.

ANSWER: Welcome to our world.

 

Tags: 510(k), CDRH, FDA, Industry, IVD, PMA

Featured Items



Glossary Terms


510(k)

Clinical Utility


 

510(k)

A 510(k) is another name for a Premarket Notification application. 510(k) applications are required for some Class I devices and all Class II devices....

Click for full definition

Clinical Utility

The device is effective for its intended use and will provide clinically significant results in a large portion of the target population....

Click for full definition