Patent (Had Better Be) Pending

Monday, March 08, 2010

"In other words, it is a violation of 35 U.S.C. § 292 to intentionally mark an item in commerce with a patent number that has expired or that does not protect the item. ... In Forest Group, Inc. v. Bon Tool Co., the Federal Circuit ruled that the $500 maximum penalty attaches to each individual article that is falsely marked..."
FDA Law Blog, 3/7/10

Yikes. I don't have any special insight or expertise in this situation, but this struck me as a pretty important link to pass along. If you mark a device "patent pending" it appears to be pretty important that you actually file a patent application. The days of using the term as an empty threat may be ending.

 

Tags: Advertising & Promotion, Best Practices, FDA

Share / Follow



Other Blog Authors

Dylan Reinhardt
Dave Kern
Maureen Mende
Jo-Ann Gonzales

Recent Blogs

Evolution of an Assay Could this also be a revolution in FDA thinking?
Good Grief! FDA's Latest LDT Announcements Here we go again...
Looking Back on the IVD Hall of Fame Even if it's not your list, here's no denying their impact on the practice of medicine
Allomap Making a difference in the lives of heart transplant patients